arbiter
JournalsAccount

Mainstream integration or ableist adaptation?—Para-athletes’ conceptions and experiences of mainstreaming parasports

Malin Andersson

International Review for the Sociology of Sport2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902261429747article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

People with disabilities do not have equal opportunities to participate in sports compared to mainstream athletes. To counteract this, the last few decades have seen growing efforts to mainstream parasports. This study investigated how underlying ableist norms shape opportunities and conditions for people with disabilities in the context of mainstreaming within Swedish sports. The method of data collection was 19 semi-structured interviews with para-athletes and parents (9 women and 10 men). After theory- and data-driven coding, ableism was applied as a conceptual lens. Findings show that the inherent comparative logic within sports triggers ableist manifestations and creates exclusionary practices towards para-athletes. For example, able-bodied ideals are internalized by para-athletes, influencing the way they perceive and value their athleticism. Conclusively, although comparisons of performance are an inextricable part of sports, the study highlights how mainstreaming contributes to emphasizing differences, thereby reinforcing ableist norms and limiting opportunities for para-athletes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902261429747

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{malin2026,
  title        = {{Mainstream integration or ableist adaptation?—Para-athletes’ conceptions and experiences of mainstreaming parasports}},
  author       = {Malin Andersson},
  journal      = {International Review for the Sociology of Sport},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902261429747},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mainstream integration or ableist adaptation?—Para-athletes’ conceptions and experiences of mainstreaming parasports

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.