Income and Preferences for International Redistribution: Theory and Evidence

Yehonatan Givati

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70004article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

How do preferences for international redistribution vary with income across countries? And within countries, are poor people more or less likely than rich people to support international redistribution? I develop a simple model which includes both domestic and international tax and transfer programs. I show that an increase in international redistribution comes at the expense of domestic redistribution. Still, I find that income is negatively correlated with support for international redistribution. Using new data on preferences for an international tax and transfer program in 29 countries, I first show a strong negative correlation across countries between income and preferences for international redistribution. Then, using individual level‐data, and different measures of income, I show that in the U.S., and within other countries, income is negatively correlated with support for international redistribution. That is, poor people are more likely than rich people to support international redistribution.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yehonatan2025,
  title        = {{Income and Preferences for International Redistribution: Theory and Evidence}},
  author       = {Yehonatan Givati},
  journal      = {Journal of Empirical Legal Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Income and Preferences for International Redistribution: Theory and Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.