The Reciprocal Relationship Between M&A Strategic Decision-making and Well-being

Kris Irwin & Chris Willis

Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021002book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

Strategic decisions leaders make involving organizational changes such as mergers and acquisitions (M&A), divestitures, and downsizing, which can influence and/or interact with other organizational factors. For example, within the context of M&A, changes impact financial performance, firm behaviors, and organizational culture. In addition, strategic decisions for these types of change can also interrelate with other more intrapersonal factors, including both leaders’ and employees’ health and well-being. Employee stress, also referred to as “merger syndrome,” outlines individual negative impacts of the changes including, but not limited to, cynicism and distrust, change wariness, and burnout, all accumulating to psychological effects including increases in detachment to work, stress, and sick leave. In this chapter, the authors outline the different impacts M&A phases have on stress and well-being and how they interrelate with the strategic decisions leaders make. The authors also outline future research opportunities and practical implications for how leaders and employees could better manage future major changes such as M&A activities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kris2023,
  title        = {{The Reciprocal Relationship Between M&A Strategic Decision-making and Well-being}},
  author       = {Kris Irwin & Chris Willis},
  journal      = {Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Reciprocal Relationship Between M&A Strategic Decision-making and Well-being

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.