arbiter
JournalsAccount

Audit Hour Budget Variances, Budget Ratcheting, and Audit Quality

Philip Keejae Hong et al.

Behavioral Research in Accounting2026https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2025-001article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study utilizes a large proprietary audit hour dataset from Korea to examine target ratcheting (the practice of adjusting future targets based on prior performance) and the ratchet effect (how employees react to target ratcheting) within the audit industry. We test whether previous findings (e.g., Ettredge et al. 2008) hold in a larger dataset covering both Big 4 and non-Big 4 firms. Consistent with the target ratcheting theory, we find empirical evidence of target ratcheting across all firms. However, unlike Ettredge et al. (2008), our results do not indicate the presence of asymmetric ratcheting. We also find that audit hours increase following favorable budget variances (i.e., actual < budgeted hours), consistent with the ratchet effect. Finally, although higher budgeted audit hours are associated with greater audit quality as measured by absolute discretionary accruals, we do not find evidence that increases in actual audit hours are associated with improved audit quality. JEL Classifications: M42; M41; G34.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2025-001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{philip2026,
  title        = {{Audit Hour Budget Variances, Budget Ratcheting, and Audit Quality}},
  author       = {Philip Keejae Hong et al.},
  journal      = {Behavioral Research in Accounting},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2025-001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Audit Hour Budget Variances, Budget Ratcheting, and Audit Quality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.