School Meals Are Evolving: Has the Evidence Kept Up?

Harold Alderman et al.

World Bank Research Observer2024https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkad012article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.62

What the paper says

Abstract School meal programs are popular social programs. They are provided to 61 percent of primary students in high-income countries but to a smaller share of students in less wealthy countries. There is a body of evidence documenting their contribution to education, health and nutrition, and social protection. But in each domain, program objectives have evolved: schooling is recognized to be more about learning than grades obtained; nutrition goals include healthy diets that reduce risks of non-communicable diseases and are more environmentally responsible; social protection programs aim to respond to acute crises and address chronic poverty. In addition to assisting in these sectors, school meal programs are tasked with creating food systems that assist smallholder farmers, an endeavor that has yet to be extensively studied. This review examines the latest evidence on these evolving dimensions of school meal programs. Findings suggest that while there is a strong evidence base for school meals, there are also specific gaps in the evidence of effectiveness and a particular lack of clarity around costs. The country-led School Meals Coalition, developed in response to COVID pandemic-related school closures, has brought new momentum to national programs and new urgency for reliable evidence on effectiveness and costs.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkad012

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{harold2024,
  title        = {{School Meals Are Evolving: Has the Evidence Kept Up?}},
  author       = {Harold Alderman et al.},
  journal      = {World Bank Research Observer},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkad012},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

School Meals Are Evolving: Has the Evidence Kept Up?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.62

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.75 × 0.4 = 0.30
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.