Optimization Models and Interpretations for Adversarial Perturbations against Support Vector Machines

Wen Su et al.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500065article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Adversarial perturbations have drawn great attention in various deep learning methods. However, little attention is paid to basic machine learning models such as support vector machines. In this paper, we investigate the optimization models and the interpretations for adversarial perturbations against linear support vector machines, including class-universal adversarial perturbations (cuAP) and universal adversarial perturbations (uAP). Unlike most of adversarial perturbations which are computed by iterative algorithms and cannot be interpreted very well, we derive explicit solutions for cuAP and uAP of binary case, and approximate solutions for cuAP and uAP of multiclassification case, respectively. We also obtain the upper bound of fooling rate for uAP. Such results not only increase the interpretability of these adversarial perturbations, but also provide great convenience in computation since iterative process can be avoided. Numerical results show that our method is fast and effective in calculating adversarial perturbations, based on which one can efficiently improve the robustness of the training model.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500065

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wen2026,
  title        = {{Optimization Models and Interpretations for Adversarial Perturbations against Support Vector Machines}},
  author       = {Wen Su et al.},
  journal      = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595926500065},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Optimization Models and Interpretations for Adversarial Perturbations against Support Vector Machines

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.