DEI rollbacks: Consequences and considerations for brand managers

Sean Sands & Carla Ferraro

Business Horizons2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.010article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.58

Abstract

As corporate landscapes evolve, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives face increasing scrutiny, with many large corporations rolling back their commitments amid sociopolitical pressures, legal uncertainties, and shifting stakeholder expectations. While such decisions may be framed as strategic recalibrations, they carry implications for brand trust, authenticity, and consumer perceptions. This article examines the consequences of DEI rollbacks from both the consumer and brand management perspectives, highlighting their impact on consumer trust, brand positioning, and corporate reputation. Drawing on contemporary examples and theoretical insights, we explore how brands can navigate these challenges while maintaining credibility and competitive advantage. We suggest that transparent communication, authenticity in brand engagement, and strategic adaptation are critical for mitigating risks associated with DEI retrenchment. For brand managers, the ability to balance external pressures with long-term brand equity considerations is essential to sustaining consumer loyalty and to fostering an inclusive corporate identity in an increasingly complex sociopolitical landscape.

12 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sean2025,
  title        = {{DEI rollbacks: Consequences and considerations for brand managers}},
  author       = {Sean Sands & Carla Ferraro},
  journal      = {Business Horizons},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.02.010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

DEI rollbacks: Consequences and considerations for brand managers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.58

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.58 × 0.4 = 0.23
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.