arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices

Michele Heath et al.

Health Care Management Review2026https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The findings of this study demonstrate a number of areas hospital leaders might examine relevant to this topic, including reluctance to use STMSs, a choice to adopt it, or a tendency to blame issues on inadequate policies or insufficient training. This situation emphasizes the necessity of offering comprehensive training and clear policies to address both the psychological barriers and practical challenges faced by clinicians.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michele2026,
  title        = {{Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices}},
  author       = {Michele Heath et al.},
  journal      = {Health Care Management Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.