← Back to results Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices Michele Heath et al.
Abstract The findings of this study demonstrate a number of areas hospital leaders might examine relevant to this topic, including reluctance to use STMSs, a choice to adopt it, or a tendency to blame issues on inadequate policies or insufficient training. This situation emphasizes the necessity of offering comprehensive training and clear policies to address both the psychological barriers and practical challenges faced by clinicians.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{michele2026,
title = {{Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices}},
author = {Michele Heath et al.},
journal = {Health Care Management Review},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices
AU - al., Michele Heath et
JO - Health Care Management Review
PY - 2026
ER - Michele Heath et al. (2026). Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices. *Health Care Management Review*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466 Michele Heath et al.. "Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices." *Health Care Management Review* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466. Understanding clinician deviance: A systematic review of text messaging practices
Michele Heath et al. · Health Care Management Review · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000466 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.