arbiter
JournalsAccount

GenAI’s Impact on Global IT Management: A Multi-Expert Perspective and Research Agenda

Yogesh K. Dwivedi et al.

Journal of Global Information Technology Management2025https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2025.2454192article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is disrupting global IT management and challenging established practice. The increasing use of GenAI technology is redefining localization, transforming existing workforce roles, outsourcing strategy, and team dynamics. Simultaneously, GenAI's security complexities have prompted the rethinking of existing risk frameworks to meet a new set of challenges from GenAI enhanced cyber threats. This article explores these complex and converging factors, providing a roadmap to address GenAI's significant impact on global IT management. We advocate the responsible adoption of GenAI and importance of building resilient, value-driven, globally consistent IT ecosystems able to adapt to the significant challenges and opportunities from the use of GenAI.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2025.2454192

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yogesh2025,
  title        = {{GenAI’s Impact on Global IT Management: A Multi-Expert Perspective and Research Agenda}},
  author       = {Yogesh K. Dwivedi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Global Information Technology Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2025.2454192},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

GenAI’s Impact on Global IT Management: A Multi-Expert Perspective and Research Agenda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.