Fertility trends across migrant generations reexamined: insights from Finnish register data

José Luis Estévez & Anna Rotkirch

European Sociological Review2026https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcag009article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Migrant descendants in several European countries show increasingly lower fertility rates, sometimes even lower than native-born peers—a pattern defying conventional expectations that migrant descendants either maintain origin-country patterns or converge toward host-country norms. Using Finnish register data (1985–1994 birth cohorts), we analyze first-birth timing across six ancestry groups spanning three migrant generations: 1.5, second, and 2.5 (children of mixed or exogamous couples). Entry into parenthood occurs progressively later across these generations, with the 2.5 generation surpassing even native Finns in postponement. We tested four mechanisms—urban residence, educational investment, economic instability, and barriers to union formation—but none explained the delay. Our study contributes to the literature by, first, underscoring the limitations of the convergence narrative to account for the fertility behaviour of migrant descendants and, second, by drawing special attention to the 2.5G as a sui generis group whose behaviour requires further conceptual and empirical attention.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcag009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{josé2026,
  title        = {{Fertility trends across migrant generations reexamined: insights from Finnish register data}},
  author       = {José Luis Estévez & Anna Rotkirch},
  journal      = {European Sociological Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcag009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Fertility trends across migrant generations reexamined: insights from Finnish register data

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.