← Back to results Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance Zheng Wu et al.
What the paper says We examine how ETF adoption affects retail investor performance using a comprehensive panel of 524,181 Finnish investors tracked from 2007 to 2022. ETF adopters tend to be older, predominantly male, and more active, holding smaller but better-diversified portfolios. Importantly, first-time use of ETFs yields statistically significant improvements in risk-adjusted returns. ETF users also demonstrate greater portfolio resilience during financial crises. Our findings confirm that ETFs serve as effective tools for enhancing performance and managing risk for retail investors.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2026.101514 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{zheng2026,
title = {{Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance}},
author = {Zheng Wu et al.},
journal = {Journal of Financial Stability},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2026.101514},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance
AU - al., Zheng Wu et
JO - Journal of Financial Stability
PY - 2026
ER - Zheng Wu et al. (2026). Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance. *Journal of Financial Stability*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2026.101514 Zheng Wu et al.. "Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance." *Journal of Financial Stability* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2026.101514. Diversification or distortion? The role of ETFs in retail investor portfolios and performance
Zheng Wu et al. · Journal of Financial Stability · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2026.101514 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.