Erratum: Whanau first: a culturally responsive evaluation of the F.A.S.T. stroke campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand

Unknown author

Journal of Social Marketing2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-01-2026-0022article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article, Hayward, B., Antric, T., Vermillion Peirce, P. and Reeder, T.A. (2025), “Whanau first: a culturally responsive evaluation of the F.A.S.T. stroke campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand”. Journal of Social Marketing, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, Link to the cited article., was published with an error in the title and purpose statement, despite the authors’ request at proof stage. In both instances “Whanau” should read “Whānau”.The correct title is “Whānau first: a culturally responsive evaluation of the F.A.S.T. stroke campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand”.The correct purpose statement should read:Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate the F.A.S.T. stroke social marketing campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand using a culturally responsive approach, examining how whānau (extended family) decision-making processes influence campaign effectiveness for Māori and Pacific communities.The publisher sincerely apologises for this error.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-01-2026-0022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Erratum: Whanau first: a culturally responsive evaluation of the F.A.S.T. stroke campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Marketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-01-2026-0022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Erratum: Whanau first: a culturally responsive evaluation of the F.A.S.T. stroke campaign in Aotearoa New Zealand

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.