Physical Appearance Anxiety and Eating Disorders Symptomatology: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Manuel Alcaraz‐Ibáñez et al.

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70097article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The present study aimed to assess the link between physical appearance anxiety (PAA) and eating disorder (ED) symptomatology by a meta-analysis of existing literature. Eligible studies were searched across six electronic databases up until November 20, 2025. Pooled effect sizes (r) were calculated using random-effects models. Potential variables that influence effect heterogeneity were analyzed by univariable and multivariable meta-regressions. Influence analyses and a three-parameter selection model (3PSM) were used to assess robustness of the results and publication bias. Twenty-seven effect sizes from 21 studies (N = 5261) were obtained. The results indicated a strong association (i.e., r = 0.559) between the two variables under consideration, which was notably stronger (i) among females compared to males; and (ii) for overall eating disorder symptoms rather than bulimic symptoms. The results of this study advocate for further investigation into the effectiveness of addressing anxiety responses related to personal body traits, particularly among females, within the context of preventing and treating eating disorders.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70097

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{manuel2026,
  title        = {{Physical Appearance Anxiety and Eating Disorders Symptomatology: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis}},
  author       = {Manuel Alcaraz‐Ibáñez et al.},
  journal      = {Scandinavian Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70097},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Physical Appearance Anxiety and Eating Disorders Symptomatology: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.