arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Theme Park Regionalization: A Comparison of Two Critical Cases

Patrick Witte & Martijn van den Hurk

Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie2026https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.70081article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The growth ambitions of theme parks and zoos in recent years have sparked academic and policy attention regarding whether such amusement facilities should be viewed not just as isolated leisure objects, but also as contributors to regional economic development. Research on theme parks is receiving less attention from a geographical and planning perspective. This article, therefore, analyses how stakeholders approach externalities of theme park expansion, considering spatial and sociocultural effects besides economic growth. Through a case study of the Efteling (amusement park) and Wildlands Adventure Zoo (zoo) in the Netherlands, we describe and explain the diverse impacts of theme park expansions, illustrating how theme park regionalization leads to various manifestations of socio‐spatial externalities. The empirical analysis of the emerging regional governance regimes leads us to suggest ‘theme ports’ as an additional analytical type of theme park development.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.70081

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{patrick2026,
  title        = {{Theme Park Regionalization: A Comparison of Two Critical Cases}},
  author       = {Patrick Witte & Martijn van den Hurk},
  journal      = {Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.70081},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Theme Park Regionalization: A Comparison of Two Critical Cases

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.