Strategic Privatization with Tariffs and Environmental Taxes in an International Mixed Duopoly

Lili Xu & Sang‐Ho Lee

Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics2015https://doi.org/10.15057/27190article
ABDC B
Weight
0.68

Abstract

We examine the strategic interaction between two governments in an international mixed duopoly market, in which a state-owned enterprise competes with private enterprises under different regimes of privatization policies with import tariffs and environmental taxes. We find that bilateral privatization leads to higher tariffs than no privatization, but unilateral privatization yields the highest tariff for a privatized country and the lowest tariff for a non-privatized country. However, a higher environmental tax is called for when a privatization policy is practiced. We also investigate a privatization choice game between two governments and show that unilateral privatization is the Nash equilibrium of the game. Finally, we compare the local optimum with the global optimum and show that the latter is independent of the regimes of privatization policies. We find a need for trade and environmental policy coordination between the two governments for global welfare maximization.

11 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/27190

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lili2015,
  title        = {{Strategic Privatization with Tariffs and Environmental Taxes in an International Mixed Duopoly}},
  author       = {Lili Xu & Sang‐Ho Lee},
  journal      = {Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2015},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/27190},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Strategic Privatization with Tariffs and Environmental Taxes in an International Mixed Duopoly

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.68

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.89 × 0.4 = 0.36
M · momentum0.64 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.