Revisiting the nexus between electricity consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability in the new BRICS: asymmetric panel evidence

Obukohwo Oba Efayena et al.

Cogent Economics and Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2611622article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The study revisits the energy consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability nexus among the new BRICS countries between 1991 and 2022. Based on the expansion of BRICS and growing needs for decarbonization, it examines if the relationship between these three indicators is symmetric or asymmetric. Using second-generation panel unit root tests, asymmetric cointegration and causality models; including Driscoll–Kraay and Feasible Generalized Least Squares estimators, the results reveal strong long-run asymmetric effects. Specifically, reductions in electricity consumption significantly reduce CO2 emissions, while increases do not produce proportionate environmental harm. The findings also show that per capita income stimulates environmental quality during periods of economic boom, while foreign direct investment (FDI) has no significant influence on CO2 emissions; thus, confirming the pollution haven hypothesis in the BRICS. The study emphasizes the need to adopt regional-specific environmental-friendly policies in the BRICS.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2611622

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{obukohwo2026,
  title        = {{Revisiting the nexus between electricity consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability in the new BRICS: asymmetric panel evidence}},
  author       = {Obukohwo Oba Efayena et al.},
  journal      = {Cogent Economics and Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2611622},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting the nexus between electricity consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability in the new BRICS: asymmetric panel evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.