arbiter
JournalsAccount

Beyond the words: how reviewer status and review features jointly affect helpfulness in online employee reviews

Jong Min Kim et al.

Journal of Business Research2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116008article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This study examines how the employment status of reviewers, specifically whether they are current or former employees, influences the perceived helpfulness of online workplace reviews. Using a dataset of 3.7 million employee reviews, we find that reviews written by current employees are generally perceived as more helpful than those written by former employees. To explore this effect, we analyze whether textual cues such as length, sentiment, and specificity interact with reviewer identity. Current employees tend to write longer reviews that include more emotional expression and specific content. Among these features, review length, which is associated with greater informativeness and perceived credibility, increases perceived helpfulness. In contrast, sentiment and specificity, which reflect subjectivity, either reduce credibility or have no significant effect. These findings suggest that the helpfulness advantage of current employee reviews depends on how well the content aligns with readers’ expectations of informative and credible communication. This study contributes to understanding how reviewer characteristics and textual features jointly shape credibility judgments in online labor platforms.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jong2026,
  title        = {{Beyond the words: how reviewer status and review features jointly affect helpfulness in online employee reviews}},
  author       = {Jong Min Kim et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Business Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Beyond the words: how reviewer status and review features jointly affect helpfulness in online employee reviews

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.