Remoteness and its impact on productivity growth among Malawi’s smallholder household farmers: A Malmquist and tobit regression approach

Efrem Zephnath Chilima et al.

African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics2025https://doi.org/10.53936/afjare.2025.20(1).2article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines the impact of remoteness on productivity growth among Malawian smallholder farmers. Utilising data from four rounds of the Integrated Household Survey Panel (2010–2019), a combined Malmquist data envelopment analysis and Tobit regression approach suggests remoteness as a crucial determinant of technical change and productivity growth. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, particularly for farmers in remote areas. Policy recommendations include investing in digital infrastructure, electronic agricultural extension services, climate-resilient practices, and farm output price transparency initiatives to address spatial disparities and promote inclusivity in Malawi’s smallholder agricultural sector. Specifically, prioritising innovative, decentralised rural development initiatives leveraging electronic platforms and piloting digital villages is recommended. This study informs policy decisions in Malawi and offers valuable insights for similar contexts, such as sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53936/afjare.2025.20(1).2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{efrem2025,
  title        = {{Remoteness and its impact on productivity growth among Malawi’s smallholder household farmers: A Malmquist and tobit regression approach}},
  author       = {Efrem Zephnath Chilima et al.},
  journal      = {African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53936/afjare.2025.20(1).2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Remoteness and its impact on productivity growth among Malawi’s smallholder household farmers: A Malmquist and tobit regression approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.