Why is my coworker ignoring me? Understanding motives for ostracism in the workplace

Kristin L. Sommer & Joshua A. Nagel

Journal of Social Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572652article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Workplaces offer many opportunities to engage in ostracism, yet the motives underlying workplace ostracism remain poorly understood. We draw from K. D. Williams's (1997, 2001) taxonomy of ostracism motives and contemporary theorizing in social and organizational psychology to outline the employee characteristics that bring about ostracism and the needs or goals that ostracism serves. We delineate between purposeful workplace ostracism (which is intentionally punitive or defensive) and nonpurposeful ostracism (which is unintentional but may nevertheless create harm and disrupt functioning within work groups). We conclude by discussing key ways in which stronger synergies between social psychology and the organizational sciences could advance scholars' understanding of ostracism both inside and outside the workplace.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572652

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kristin2025,
  title        = {{Why is my coworker ignoring me? Understanding motives for ostracism in the workplace}},
  author       = {Kristin L. Sommer & Joshua A. Nagel},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2572652},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Why is my coworker ignoring me? Understanding motives for ostracism in the workplace

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.