A Case in Practice: Facilitating Problem Definition in a Systems Change Approach

Kristen Rohanna et al.

American Journal of Evaluation2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261418648article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Evaluation can be a means for improving challenging problems and transforming systems in addition to determining worth. In the past decade, the field of evaluation has embraced more formative modes of evaluation, including systems thinking and complexity science approaches, that seek to improve a particular problem, situation, or system within which the problem is situated. As such, the evaluator’s initial role may be one that supports interest holders in identifying and defining a problem before seeking to improve it. However, the evaluation literature is limited in studies and discussions about problem definition. Through an illustrative case study, this research demonstrates how to facilitate problem definition in a systems change approach known as Problem-Bound Evaluation. The findings emphasize a need for structured yet flexible facilitation when using the tools and embracing multiple perspectives to understand a problem.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261418648

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kristen2026,
  title        = {{A Case in Practice: Facilitating Problem Definition in a Systems Change Approach}},
  author       = {Kristen Rohanna et al.},
  journal      = {American Journal of Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140261418648},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Case in Practice: Facilitating Problem Definition in a Systems Change Approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.