Individual loss reserving for multi-coverage insurance

Roxane Turcotte & Peng Shi

ASTIN Bulletin2026https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2026.10083article
AJG 2ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Individual loss reserving methods have undergone substantial development in the past decade, driven by increased accessibility to granular-level insurance claims data. This paper presents a micro loss reserving model tailored for multi-coverage insurance policies, where a single insurance claim might trigger payments from multiple coverage types. We employ a copula-based multivariate regression approach to jointly model the settlement time and loss amount, effectively capturing the dependence among various types of loss amounts and their correlation with the settlement time. We stress the importance of considering both types of dependence for accurate reserving prediction and uncertainty quantification. Furthermore, we propose computationally efficient algorithms for parameter estimation and dynamic prediction. Through numerical experiments and real data analysis, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed multivariate predictive model in loss reserving applications.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2026.10083

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{roxane2026,
  title        = {{Individual loss reserving for multi-coverage insurance}},
  author       = {Roxane Turcotte & Peng Shi},
  journal      = {ASTIN Bulletin},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2026.10083},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Individual loss reserving for multi-coverage insurance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.