arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Data Licensing for Public Interest: A retrospective analysis of the COVID-19 open dataset

Oscar Wahltinez & M. Rincón

Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management2025https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v20i1.3557article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical need for accessible public health data. However, navigating the complexities of data licensing remains a major challenge, complicating the aggregation, analysis, and sharing of such data. These difficulties are further compounded by diverse legal systems, each with its own copyright and intellectual property rules. This study examines the licensing terms of 301 datasets within the COVID-19 Open Data metadataset, revealing key barriers to public health data accessibility. To address these challenges, we propose a decision flow diagram to guide users through license compatibility and republishing permissions, enabling ethical and legal aggregation under permissive licenses. We also present practical guidelines for data producers in public health, aimed at improving the clarity and usability of shared data. These recommendations reflect common licensing issues and the needs of data users, promoting more effective data sharing. By addressing these barriers, this work offers strategies to enhance the availability and impact of public health data, supporting better responses to current and future global health emergencies.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v20i1.3557

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{oscar2025,
  title        = {{Data Licensing for Public Interest: A retrospective analysis of the COVID-19 open dataset}},
  author       = {Oscar Wahltinez & M. Rincón},
  journal      = {Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v20i1.3557},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Data Licensing for Public Interest: A retrospective analysis of the COVID-19 open dataset

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.