arbiter
JournalsAccount

Correction

Unknown author

Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing2025https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2025.2450948article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates how learning capability orientation and relational ties affect small offshoring subcontractors' decision to internalize export marketing resources.We designed a multiple-source survey and collected data from 158 small Taiwanese subcontractors in high-tech industries.The results show that (1) small exploration-oriented subcontractors will be likely to internalize export marketing resources, whereas small exploitationoriented manufacturers will not do so; (2) small subcontractors with more relational ties with home-country upstream suppliers will internalize export marketing resources, whereas small subcontractors with more relational ties with home-country industry peers will not do so; and (3) environmental uncertainty will moderate all these proposed effects.We found substitutive and complementary effects between each different resource/ capability on small subcontractors' strategy in internalizing export marketing resources.Our study provides a comprehensive resource-based view lens through which to examine new resource growth strategies for firms.The correction has now been made, and the following

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2025.2450948

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2025,
  title        = {{Correction}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2025.2450948},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Correction

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.