arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Du Bois and Veblen’s Concepts of Relative Position: Common Ground for Stratification Economics and Institutionalist Economics?

J. B. Davis

Review of Radical Political Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134261422518article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

W.E.B. Du Bois and Thorstein Veblen employed the concept of relative position. Du Bois’s thinking reflects how for Stratification economics people’s relative positions explain racial discrimination and segregation. Veblen’s reflects how for Institutionalist economics people’s relative positions explain the role institutions have in the evolution of the economy. Racism in the United States marginalized Du Bois’s contributions, leaving a divide between his and Veblen’s thinking and also between Stratification economics and Institutionalist economics. This has limited the perceived importance of the concept of relative position in economics, leaving it with the “position-less” asocial individualism of Neoclassical-mainstream economics. This article compares Du Bois’s and Veblen’s conceptions of the concept of relative position and discusses the potential common ground it creates for Stratification economics and Institutionalist economics. JEL Classification: B15, B31, B41, Z13

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134261422518

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{j.2026,
  title        = {{Du Bois and Veblen’s Concepts of Relative Position: Common Ground for Stratification Economics and Institutionalist Economics?}},
  author       = {J. B. Davis},
  journal      = {Review of Radical Political Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134261422518},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Du Bois and Veblen’s Concepts of Relative Position: Common Ground for Stratification Economics and Institutionalist Economics?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.