Robust Hedging GANs: Towards Automated Robustification of Hedging Strategies

Yannick Limmer & Blanka Horvath

Applied Mathematical Finance2024https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486x.2024.2440661article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.34

Abstract

The availability of deep hedging has opened new horizons for solving hedging problems under a large variety of realistic market conditions. At the same time, any model – be it a traditional stochastic model or a market generator – is at best an approximation of market reality, prone to model-misspecification and estimation errors. This raises the question, how to address the risk of discrepancy between anticipated distribution and market reality, in an automated way. This paper presents a natural extension of the original deep hedging framework to address uncertainty in the data generating process via an adversarial approach inspired by GANs. This is achieved through an interplay of three modular components: (i) a (deep) hedging engine, (ii) a data-generating process (that is model agnostic permitting a large variety of classical models as well as machine learning-based market generators), and (iii) a notion of distance on model space to measure deviations between our market prognosis and reality. We do not restrict the ambiguity set to a region around a reference model, but instead penalize deviations from the anticipated distribution. We demonstrate this in numerical experiments to benchmark our framework against other existing results.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486x.2024.2440661

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yannick2024,
  title        = {{Robust Hedging GANs: Towards Automated Robustification of Hedging Strategies}},
  author       = {Yannick Limmer & Blanka Horvath},
  journal      = {Applied Mathematical Finance},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486x.2024.2440661},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Robust Hedging GANs: Towards Automated Robustification of Hedging Strategies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.08 × 0.4 = 0.03
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.