arbiter
JournalsAccount

Social and values heterogeneity, and the crisis of liberal democracy: classical liberal diagnostic and modus vivendi governance solutions

Paul Dragos Aligica & Peter J. Boettke

Constitutional Political Economy2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-026-09507-5article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

To uphold classical liberal values in the 21st century, it is crucial to recognize that the classical liberal tradition itself emerged as a profound response to the crisis of pluralism triggered by the breakdown - during the Protestant Reformation- of a unified and coherent worldview centered around the Catholic Church. Any attempt to address contemporary challenges by drawing on the lessons, insights, and intellectual tools of the liberal tradition must begin with a thorough examination of this foundational reality. Specifically, we must revisit the issues of deep social heterogeneity, incommensurability, and the pluralism of worldviews, values, and beliefs among individuals, communities, and societies. This paper will first identify and explore these aspects before shifting the discussion to the governance structures necessary for managing such complexities. The analysis will emphasize three key principles or features of a governance system designed to address the challenges of pluralism, heterogeneity of views, values, and lifestyles, and the resulting tensions and trade-offs: polycentricity (E. and V. Ostrom), catallaxy (F. A. Hayek), and modus vivendi (B. Williams).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-026-09507-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2026,
  title        = {{Social and values heterogeneity, and the crisis of liberal democracy: classical liberal diagnostic and modus vivendi governance solutions}},
  author       = {Paul Dragos Aligica & Peter J. Boettke},
  journal      = {Constitutional Political Economy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-026-09507-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Social and values heterogeneity, and the crisis of liberal democracy: classical liberal diagnostic and modus vivendi governance solutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.