arbiter
JournalsAccount

Defining Transformation Within the Interdisciplinary Field of Human Resource Development

Derek Lowstuter

Human Resource Development Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843261441193article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In Human Resource Development (HRD), the term “transformation” is frequently invoked to describe profound personal change, yet it often lacks a precise and actionable definition. This absence of conceptual clarity risks reducing transformation into an ambiguous ideal rather than a rigorous, researchable construct. To address this gap, this article examines how transformation has been defined and applied, critically reviews its theoretical underpinnings, and identifies limitations in current usage. Drawing from intersecting frameworks, transformative learning (TL), posttraumatic growth (PTG), and Jungian individuation, the analysis integrates their strengths while addressing conceptual shortcomings. The article proposes an actionable, theoretically grounded definition of individual transformation that captures the nature, process, and outcomes of deep, irreversible personal change in ways that advance both scholarly understanding and HRD practice.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843261441193

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{derek2026,
  title        = {{Defining Transformation Within the Interdisciplinary Field of Human Resource Development}},
  author       = {Derek Lowstuter},
  journal      = {Human Resource Development Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843261441193},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Defining Transformation Within the Interdisciplinary Field of Human Resource Development

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.