arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Feedback to the Forefront: How and When Supervisor Developmental Feedback Fosters Civil Servants’ Taking-Charge Behavior

Wenjing Cai et al.

Review of Public Personnel Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251408443article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Based on social information processing (SIP) theory, this study examines the relationship between supervisor developmental feedback and civil servants’ taking-charge behavior by exploring the mediating role of responsibility awareness and the moderating role of workplace inclusion. A multi-wave field study was conducted with data collected from 229 civil servants working in four local government institutions in China. The results show that supervisor developmental feedback is positively related to civil servants’ taking-charge behavior by increasing the perception of constructive responsibility. In addition, we found that workplace inclusion moderates not only the relationship between constructive responsibility perception and taking-charge behavior but also the indirect relationship between supervisor developmental feedback and taking-charge behavior via the constructive responsibility perception. The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in light of their implications for future research and practice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251408443

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{wenjing2026,
  title        = {{Feedback to the Forefront: How and When Supervisor Developmental Feedback Fosters Civil Servants’ Taking-Charge Behavior}},
  author       = {Wenjing Cai et al.},
  journal      = {Review of Public Personnel Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251408443},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Feedback to the Forefront: How and When Supervisor Developmental Feedback Fosters Civil Servants’ Taking-Charge Behavior

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.