Categorisation of sex and age from facial appearance

Paul G. Aitken & Paul E. Downing

Cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106483article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Faces carry intertwined cues to multiple social dimensions, which are often examined in isolation. Here we investigated the categorisation of sex and age from human faces to determine whether these dimensions are analysed in parallel or rely on shared processes. Three experiments with large sample sizes tested age or sex classification tasks: a Garner speeded classification task (Garner, 1974), a word-priming task, and a face-priming task. Garner interference was found between sex and age but was stronger in the age task than the sex task. Both word and face priming effects were found, but these varied as a function of stimulus set. These effects cannot be explained by differences in task difficulty nor by carryover of response mappings. We also replicated findings that young females and old males were categorised more efficiently than young males and old females. Using three different sets of faces provided evidence about whether interference and priming effects originated at the stimulus level or a more abstract level. We propose that the asymmetric relationship between the processes that categorise faces by age and by sex reflects a hierarchical organisation of social dimensions in the face, such that age coding is nested within sex coding. One underlying driver of this scheme may be that age judgements typically rely more on featural than configural processing, whereas sex judgements show the opposite tendency. Our findings illustrate how considering joint coding of social dimensions sheds new light on face perception mechanisms.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106483

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2026,
  title        = {{Categorisation of sex and age from facial appearance}},
  author       = {Paul G. Aitken & Paul E. Downing},
  journal      = {Cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106483},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Categorisation of sex and age from facial appearance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.