The role of the central bank in managing expectations, backing up public debt, and controlling public deficits
Fernando Perera-Tallo
What the paper says
Can a central bank prevent self-fulfilling debt crises without creating a moral hazard problem? This paper examines this question by presenting a public debt model with self-fulfilling debt crises. In it, the central bank can prevent such self-fulfilling prophecies by announcing purchases of public debt that do not materialize at the equilibrium and that are credible even with imperfect or no commitment. However, a backstop policy creates a moral hazard problem. That is, the government may be tempted to increase its deficit because the central bank's policy of averting self-fulfilling debt crises reduces the probability of public debt repudiation and the associated costs. To avoid this, the central bank can design an optimal incentive contract along with a credible threat policy consisting of reducing its interventions in the debt market. This policy would mitigate or even eliminate the moral hazard problem. • The paper presents a model in which self-fulfilling public debt crises arise. • The central bank can avert, under certain circumstances, self-fulfilling debt crises through credible announcements of public debt purchases that are never implemented. • The optimal central bank’s credible backup policy is presented. • A moral hazard problem arises when the central bank averts self-fulfilling debt crises, which makes the government tempted to increase the deficit. • If the central bank does not impose conditionality, the government will raise the deficit beyond the level that it would have reached in the absence of the central bank’s backup policy. • The central bank may solve the moral hazard problem by imposing conditionality on the government through a combination of optimal credible threats and an incentive-compatible contract.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.