EXPRESS: Communication Patterns in Joint Decision-Making

Kelley Gullo Wight et al.

Journal of Marketing Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437261439058article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Communication is a key aspect of the joint decision-making process, yet the field lacks an understanding of how people talk to each other while making joint decisions. In the present research, we analyzed nearly two hundred joint decision conversations from shop-along observations. We found that joint decision conversations are composed of four distinct communication patterns, which characterize how partners talk to each other: (1) coordination (including inquiry and disclosure), (2) contrast (including persuasion and devil’s advocate), (3) build, and (4) one-sided. We then used these communication patterns as the building blocks of joint decision conversations to quantitatively model how communication patterns dynamically flow while partners shop together, finding that decision partners navigate the decision lifecycle non-linearly and the usage of the communication patterns affects immediate satisfaction outcomes. Our findings enabled us to draw connections across the splintered literatures on dyadic communication. We develop a taxonomy that reflects an integrated, cross-disciplinary phenomenological understanding of each communication pattern to facilitate interdisciplinary research. Theoretical advancements and practical implications are discussed, as are areas for future research.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437261439058

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kelley2026,
  title        = {{EXPRESS: Communication Patterns in Joint Decision-Making}},
  author       = {Kelley Gullo Wight et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Marketing Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437261439058},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

EXPRESS: Communication Patterns in Joint Decision-Making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.