arbiter
JournalsAccount

Testing a Unified Anomie and Choice Model of Offender Decision Making

Kyle J. Thomas

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0011article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Disciplinary differences in sociology and economics have manifested in the former emphasizing structural risk factors and the latter individual choice. In attempt to help bridge this divide, I incorporate rational choice inputs to Mertonian anomie theory. I test this model employing panel data models using the Pathways to Desistance study. The results indicate that »objective« socioeconomic disadvantage reduces individuals perceptions of opportunities for legitimate avenues of success and a weakening of pro-social value orientations. Further, weakening of conventional values predict tolerance for risk and views of the thrills and excitement from crime which in turn are predictive of individual offending.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0011

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kyle2025,
  title        = {{Testing a Unified Anomie and Choice Model of Offender Decision Making}},
  author       = {Kyle J. Thomas},
  journal      = {Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Testing a Unified Anomie and Choice Model of Offender Decision Making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.