arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

HRM practices and innovation

Unknown author

Human Resource Management International Digest2026https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-02-2026-0045article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/methodology/approach This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings Researchers explored how human resource management (HRM) practices can improve an organization’s ability to innovate. The central finding of the study was that HRM practices develop human capital, which increases the capability of the organization to acquire and create new knowledge, leading to more innovative performance. The research was conducted in Pakistan, making it a valuable contribution from a developing country context. Originality/value The briefing saves busy executives, strategists and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-02-2026-0045

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{HRM practices and innovation}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Human Resource Management International Digest},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid-02-2026-0045},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

HRM practices and innovation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.