arbiter
JournalsAccount

To Be or Not To Be (Aligned with Elites): Navigating Systemic Power within Informal Institutions

Christopher Sutter et al.

Academy of Management Journal2026https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0515article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Social intermediaries play a critical role in addressing exclusion, but must navigate entrenched power relations within informal institutions. Drawing on comparative case studies of three social intermediaries, this study examines how intermediaries negotiate systemic power—manifested through domination and discipline—across intersecting caste–gender hierarchies. We identify three distinct approaches to elite engagement: elite delegation, elite co-optation, and creative accommodation. Each of these reflects a specific combination of communal positioning and power frame adopted by intermediaries. Elite delegation, grounded in a detached communal positioning and a zero-sum power frame, prioritizes rapid scaling but reproduces existing hierarchies. Elite co-optation, marked by pragmatic communal positioning and a conditional positive-sum power frame, fosters short-term cooperation yet achieves only partial inclusion. Creative accommodation, characterized by embedded communal positioning and a positive-sum power frame, enables social transformation by simultaneously empowering marginalized groups and constructively engaging elites. By demonstrating how communal positioning and power frames shape these approaches, the study advances understanding of how systemic power sustains exclusion and how it can be reconfigured from within. We contribute to research on informal institutions and inclusion by elucidating how intermediaries can leverage positive-sum engagements to reshape domination and discipline, fostering more equitable and enduring informal institutional change.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0515

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2026,
  title        = {{To Be or Not To Be (Aligned with Elites): Navigating Systemic Power within Informal Institutions}},
  author       = {Christopher Sutter et al.},
  journal      = {Academy of Management Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.0515},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

To Be or Not To Be (Aligned with Elites): Navigating Systemic Power within Informal Institutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.