arbiter
JournalsAccount

Attributional sense‐making of distrust in professional service firms: Working in a coopetitive paradox

Neve Abgeller et al.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70086article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Distrust is an inevitable yet often overlooked feature of relationships in professional service firms (PSFs), where simultaneous demands to collaborate and compete produce a coopetitive paradox shaping everyday organizational life. Drawing on 50 in‐depth qualitative interviews using the critical incident technique, we examine how professionals attribute meaning to the development of distrust in their working relationships. The analysis identifies three recurring loci—readings of character and conduct (internal), signals from structures, processes, and cultures (external), and interactional cues in day‐to‐day exchanges (relational)—which often braid together into compound explanations for distrust that travel and endure. In high pressure, identity‐sensitive PSFs, coopetition heightens this braiding, making small ambiguities easier to read as self‐interest and harder to reverse. The study clarifies how distrust functions as an active, socially embedded process of meaning‐making and why it proves so durable in coopetitive settings.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70086

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{neve2026,
  title        = {{Attributional sense‐making of distrust in professional service firms: Working in a coopetitive paradox}},
  author       = {Neve Abgeller et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70086},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Attributional sense‐making of distrust in professional service firms: Working in a coopetitive paradox

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.