Hoarding without hoarders: Opportunity hoarding in the absence of exclusionary behaviors

João M. Souto-Maior

Rationality and Society2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631261417800article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper seeks to clarify the concept of opportunity hoarding as it applies to Black-White educational inequalities. Two prevailing interpretations stand out: a group-disparity interpretation, which treats opportunity hoarding as any process generating group differences, and an exclusionary-behaviors interpretation, which emphasizes how White actors secure advantages through exclusionary practices. I argue that the former is too broad — remaining vague about the underlying mechanisms — and the latter too narrow, overlooking what I term hoarding without hoarders, i.e., opportunity hoarding that arises even in the absence of exclusionary behaviors. I define opportunity hoarding as the relational processes that generate racial penalties in access to resources, i.e., disparities unexplained by previously formed individual differences. Using an agent-based model of racial disparities in advanced course-taking, this paper shows how network diffusion — under segregation, consolidation of race and socioeconomic status, and temporal constraints — can produce racial penalties even when behaviors are race-neutral. The framework highlights the need for scholars and policymakers to look beyond exclusionary acts in the hoarding of valuable resources.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631261417800

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joão2026,
  title        = {{Hoarding without hoarders: Opportunity hoarding in the absence of exclusionary behaviors}},
  author       = {João M. Souto-Maior},
  journal      = {Rationality and Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631261417800},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Hoarding without hoarders: Opportunity hoarding in the absence of exclusionary behaviors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.