arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Coevolution of trust dynamics and formal contracting in governing inter-organisation exchange

Chien Yun Wang & Cheng Min Chuang

International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing2024https://doi.org/10.1504/ijshc.2024.136709article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

Recently, interest in the correlation between 'contract' in transaction governance and 'trust' in relational governance mechanisms has been growing. This study focuses on issues related to the evolution of contract and inter-organisational trust dynamics in transaction governance and uses mixed research method to investigate sectors related to transaction governance in Taiwan's electronics industry. The study finds higher flexibility in contract implementation to be a promoter of trust between two parties in a relationship, thereby promoting project execution efficiency in the case of Taiwanese firms. Organisational management differs between the East and West; therefore, Western firms should understand how various contractual provisions can be used to accommodate different transactions when cooperating with Taiwanese electronics companies.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijshc.2024.136709

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chien2024,
  title        = {{Coevolution of trust dynamics and formal contracting in governing inter-organisation exchange}},
  author       = {Chien Yun Wang & Cheng Min Chuang},
  journal      = {International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijshc.2024.136709},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Coevolution of trust dynamics and formal contracting in governing inter-organisation exchange

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.