The existing division of corporate decision - making power in the UK, USA and Europe: A comparative perspective

Shida Galletti

Enterprise Governance eJournal2015https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6933article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

This article considers the functions of the shareholders, particularly institutional investors, in corporate governance. Part 1 examines the current division of decision-making powers in the Anglo-American legal systems and its consequences; Part 2 discusses whether shifting power towards shareholders would really constitute an advantage for the firm as a whole; Part 3 looks more specifically at institutional investors, their capacity to take a leading role in running the company and the reasons for their apathy; and Part 4 seeks to address some of the regulatory reforms that should be considered in the UK and the United States of America, although it is argued that regulation is often prompted by the urge to respond to a crisis rather than by the actual need to re-think entirely the present allocation of powers.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6933

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shida2015,
  title        = {{The existing division of corporate decision - making power in the UK, USA and Europe: A comparative perspective}},
  author       = {Shida Galletti},
  journal      = {Enterprise Governance eJournal},
  year         = {2015},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6933},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The existing division of corporate decision - making power in the UK, USA and Europe: A comparative perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.