Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy

Beate Sjåfjell & Jukka Mähönen

Bond Law Review2024https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050article
ABDC B
Weight
0.38

Abstract

Corporate purpose has again become a topic of discussion in company law and corporate governance. In the European Union, the tension between the societal approach to companies with its long history and the efficiency-based approach with its much shorter history (and weaker basis) is palpable in the heated debates ever since the European Commission launched its Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative in 2020. In this debate, shareholder primacy proponents have sought to frame the discussion within what we call a shareholder v stakeholder dichotomy. The dichotomy is misleading and dangerous in the way it takes company law proper out of the discussion and reinforces the shareholder primacy drive. We reject the dichotomy as a meaningful framing of the debate and seek to dismantle some of the strawmen set up on the road towards sustainable corporate governance. We instead discuss corporate purpose as a matter of company law and relevant to ensuring the contribution of business to sustainability, and how such an overarching purpose could be operationalised with a redefinition of duties of the board. With this backdrop, we analyse the Sustainable Corporate Governance initiative, concentrating on company law and sustainability aspects of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{beate2024,
  title        = {{Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy}},
  author       = {Beate Sjåfjell & Jukka Mähönen},
  journal      = {Bond Law Review},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.94050},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corporate Purpose and the Misleading Shareholder vs Stakeholder Dichotomy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.19 × 0.4 = 0.08
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.