Examining Externality on Welfare and Market Access Arising from Consumer Heterogeneity

Namrata Gulati

Studies in Microeconomics2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222261424091article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper extends the literature on spatial price–quality competition by looking into the welfare impact of increased consumer heterogeneity. This is done by incorporating consumer heterogeneity into a model where firms compete simultaneously in price and quality within a circular market framework. Consumers are assumed to have either high or low willingness to pay for quality, thereby capturing both vertical and horizontal product differentiation in the model. The analysis establishes that as consumer heterogeneity increases, welfare for low-preference consumers follows an inverted-U pattern. Initially, greater heterogeneity enhances welfare by inducing firms to offer higher-quality products at higher prices. However, beyond a threshold, rising production costs and hence, price increases outweigh these benefits, leading to reduced welfare and access to the market for consumers with a low preference for quality. This finding highlights a crucial trade-off between quality improvement and affordability, and hence, in market access. This offers an important insight into framing policies that aim to promote inclusive market access and maintain balanced quality competition. JEL Classifications: D21, D62, I31, D49

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222261424091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{namrata2026,
  title        = {{Examining Externality on Welfare and Market Access Arising from Consumer Heterogeneity}},
  author       = {Namrata Gulati},
  journal      = {Studies in Microeconomics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222261424091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Examining Externality on Welfare and Market Access Arising from Consumer Heterogeneity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.