arbiter
JournalsAccount

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

Gleb Papyshev & Keith Jin Deng Chan

Electronic Markets2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00870-zarticle
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines the European Union’s (EU) strategy to assert digital sovereignty through stringent artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, situated within evolving geopolitical dynamics and widening technological disparities with the United States (US). A game-theoretic model is developed to analyze the strategic dilemma confronting EU regulators, who must balance the protection of domestic market share for local firms against maintaining access to leading AI technologies. The analysis shows that stringent regulation constitutes a rational strategy only when it disproportionately constrains foreign firms and when foreign technological advantages in the domestic market are significant but not overwhelming. Applying this framework to the EU AI Act’s provisions on general-purpose AI, the study illustrates that the effectiveness of the EU’s approach is contingent on its redistributive effect on domestic market power, the level of US technological competitiveness, and the state of transatlantic cooperation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00870-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gleb2026,
  title        = {{AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities}},
  author       = {Gleb Papyshev & Keith Jin Deng Chan},
  journal      = {Electronic Markets},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00870-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

AI regulatory strategies for digital sovereignty: The role of geopolitics and technological disparities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.