arbiter
JournalsAccount

Dynamic Preferences for Redistribution: Understanding Welfare Support in Argentina

Ayelén Vanegas

Comparative Politics2026https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17674725337090article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Why can support for cash transfers decrease among beneficiaries when poverty is growing? This article argues that support for redistributive policies is dynamic and shaped by citizens’ evaluations of policy results. When beneficiaries feel cash transfers help them cope with hardship, support can increase. However, if recipients perceive these policies as insufficient in offsetting their economic situation, they may view them as ineffective in consistently alleviating poverty. Consequently, recipients may oppose expanding cash transfers while continuing to support deeper redistributive policies—such as education and job-training programs—that offer long-term economic improvement. Using a multi-method design that combines weighted difference-in-differences estimations, machine learning models, focus groups, and a novel face-to-face survey in Argentina, the findings show how preferences for redistribution can change in different contexts.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17674725337090

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ayelén2026,
  title        = {{Dynamic Preferences for Redistribution: Understanding Welfare Support in Argentina}},
  author       = {Ayelén Vanegas},
  journal      = {Comparative Politics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17674725337090},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dynamic Preferences for Redistribution: Understanding Welfare Support in Argentina

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.