Mapping research impact services in health sciences and medical libraries: an observational study
Xinyu Peng & Fei Yu
What the paper says
Introduction. Research impact service is an emerging area of library practice responding to rising demand from funding agencies and institutional administration. This study examines the scope of this service in medical and health sciences libraries and informs practice for developing or expanding such initiatives. Method. An observational content analysis was conducted on publicly accessible webpages of member libraries of the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries (AAHSL). Libraries were categorized into four service levels, from basic guides (Level 1) to dedicated teams (Level 4). Data were manually collected and descriptively analyzed for service scope, staffing models, tools, metrics, frameworks, and deliverables. Results. Of 189 libraries (174 U.S., 5 Canada, 10 elsewhere), 140 offer research impact services: 49 at Level 1, 61 at Level 2, 16 at Level 3, and 13 at Level 4. Scopus and Web of Science were most frequently used. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) and the Leiden Manifesto were most referenced. Conclusion(s). While most libraries offer research impact services, fewer than 20% provide advanced support (Levels 3–4), highlighting the need to strengthen workforce capacity in this area.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.