Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations

Salvatore Piccolo & Markus Reisinger

Journal of Competition Law and Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf005article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper considers competition between two supply chains where one manufacturer has uncertain production costs and can share this private information with its rival. In contrast to existing literature, we study bottom-up negotiations in which dealers make offers to consumers before negotiating with manufacturers, as is common in many industries with complex products, such as interior design, trucks, or luxury cars. Furthermore, we allow for both quality-enhancing and cost-reducing investments and study how these variables affect the incentive to share information and the competitive effects of this conduct. We show that with bottom-up negotiations, information sharing is profitable and procompetitive. In contrast, in the classic model of vertical relations, where the manufacturer makes its choices before the retailer does, exchange of information is unprofitable. We also discuss the implementation of our mechanism by the coordinated setting of list prices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{salvatore2025,
  title        = {{Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations}},
  author       = {Salvatore Piccolo & Markus Reisinger},
  journal      = {Journal of Competition Law and Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Information Sharing and Coordination Between Supply Chains with Bottom-Up Negotiations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.