Challenges as a Catalyst for Innovation in Public Procurement: A Case Study on Characteristics, Process and Success Factors

Christian von Deimling et al.

Journal of Innovation Economics2025https://doi.org/10.3917/e.jie.pr2.0194article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This research investigates how challenges, as a specialized form of innovation contest, function within public procurement, an area underexplored in existing PPI literature.While public procurement of innovation (PPI) is widely studied, most research focuses on traditional instruments, with limited attention to competition-based formats like challenges.To address this gap, we conduct a qualitative case study combining document analysis and expert interviews.The study explores key characteristics, processes, and success factors of challenges in the public sector.Elements such as motivation, task specificity, degree of elaboration, and organizational structure were identified as critical to their success.This research contributes to the literature by introducing a process-oriented model and provides guidance for public authorities.This research delivers both a conceptual typology and an applied framework, enhancing understanding of how open innovation contests can support innovation-oriented procurement strategies.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/e.jie.pr2.0194

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christian2025,
  title        = {{Challenges as a Catalyst for Innovation in Public Procurement: A Case Study on Characteristics, Process and Success Factors}},
  author       = {Christian von Deimling et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Innovation Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/e.jie.pr2.0194},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Challenges as a Catalyst for Innovation in Public Procurement: A Case Study on Characteristics, Process and Success Factors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.