The bilingual advantage: it's how you measure it

Ainoa Aparicio Fenoll & Zoë Kuehn

Journal of Demographic Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.3article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

We use data on Latino children in the United States who have been randomly assigned calculation tests in English or Spanish to check for the so-called bilingual advantage, the notion that knowing more than one language improves individuals’ other cognitive skills. After controlling for different characteristics of children and their parents, as well as children's time in the US, we find a bilingual advantage among children who read or write in English and Spanish but not for those who only speak or understand both languages. In particular, bilingual readers or writers perform one-fourth to one-third of a standard deviation better than monolingual children, equal to learning gains of an additional school year. Applying the Oster test, we find that selection on unobservables would need to be 3–4 times stronger than selection on observables to explain away our results. The bilingual advantage is stronger among children in two-parent households with siblings and for those at the upper end of the ability distribution.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.3

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ainoa2025,
  title        = {{The bilingual advantage: it's how you measure it}},
  author       = {Ainoa Aparicio Fenoll & Zoë Kuehn},
  journal      = {Journal of Demographic Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.3},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The bilingual advantage: it's how you measure it

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.