Socioeconomic and Immigration Disparities in Ostracism: A Study of Statistical Outliers

Dongning Ren et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251414824article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Does ostracism disproportionally affect certain groups? Which groups are at greater risk, and in which social domains (e.g., family, workplace)? To address these questions, we adopted a descriptive approach, leveraging a probability-based sample of Dutch adults, with 5,290 participants and 22,075 ratings of ostracism experiences in various social domains. The distribution of ostracism ratings was zero-inflated and extremely skewed: the majority of values clustered at the left end of the spectrum, indicating ostracism as a rare experience; a smaller number of values formed a tail of statistical outliers indicating ostracism as a frequent experience. Low-income (vs. high) earners had over three times higher odds of facing ostracism frequently by family members and people at work. Immigrants had two to three times higher odds of experiencing ostracism frequently than non-immigrants across all domains. These results highlight group-based disparities in ostracism experiences and identify priority populations in need of support.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251414824

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dongning2026,
  title        = {{Socioeconomic and Immigration Disparities in Ostracism: A Study of Statistical Outliers}},
  author       = {Dongning Ren et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251414824},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Socioeconomic and Immigration Disparities in Ostracism: A Study of Statistical Outliers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.