arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Easy to Understand, Easy to See: Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency Drives News Headline Selection

Elizabeth E. Riggs

Journal of Language and Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x261424551article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

People generally prefer fluent, or easy, information processing experiences. Consequently, processing fluency often impacts individuals’ judgments and evaluations of information. Previous research found that processing fluency influenced headline selection and recognition. The present experiment replicated and extended this work by testing whether type of fluency, comparing conceptual (language difficulty) and perceptual (figure-to-background contrast) fluency manipulations, impacts selection and recognition of news headlines. Results demonstrated that individuals showed strong preferences for fluent news headlines, across both types of fluency manipulations. However, only the conceptual fluency manipulation impacted recognition, such that easy language was associated with higher recognition.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x261424551

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elizabeth2026,
  title        = {{Easy to Understand, Easy to See: Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency Drives News Headline Selection}},
  author       = {Elizabeth E. Riggs},
  journal      = {Journal of Language and Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x261424551},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Easy to Understand, Easy to See: Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency Drives News Headline Selection

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.