A kinetic theory approach to consensus formation in financial markets

Jean-Gabriel Attali & Francesco Salvarani

Quantitative Finance and Economics2026https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2026006article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It is sometimes acknowledged that (sell-side) equity analysts' recommendations influence investors and therefore market prices. In particular, the S&P 500 is expected to decline (or rise) when analysts revise their targets downward (upward, respectively). Our findings indicate not only that the analysts' consensus exert no influence on market prices, but also that, conversely, analysts appear to set their target prices based on markets prices. Employing a kinetic theory framework, we model the dynamics of the analysts' opinions, by taking both the mutual influences shaping price consensus and the dynamics of the actual S&P 500 index level into account. The model is calibrated on a training subset of data and tested on an independent set to assess its predictive power. Our tests show that just three free parameters are enough to accurately predict the one-year average price forecasts of analysts.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2026006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jean-gabriel2026,
  title        = {{A kinetic theory approach to consensus formation in financial markets}},
  author       = {Jean-Gabriel Attali & Francesco Salvarani},
  journal      = {Quantitative Finance and Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2026006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A kinetic theory approach to consensus formation in financial markets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.