← Back to results Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal Sebastian Denk & Günter Löffler
Abstract This paper reappraises the usefulness of combining individual forecasts for predicting the U.S. equity premium. For comparison, we also consider penalized regression and dimension reduction approaches. We fail to find evidence of predictive ability in recent decades, regardless of the forecasting method used. Further analysis shows that an increase in the correlation of individual forecast errors is an important factor in the declining performance of combination forecasts.
6 citations
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raae009 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{sebastian2024,
title = {{Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal}},
author = {Sebastian Denk & Günter Löffler},
journal = {Review of Asset Pricing Studies},
year = {2024},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raae009},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal
AU - Denk, Sebastian
AU - Löffler, Günter
JO - Review of Asset Pricing Studies
PY - 2024
ER - Sebastian Denk & Günter Löffler (2024). Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal. *Review of Asset Pricing Studies*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raae009 Sebastian Denk & Günter Löffler. "Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal." *Review of Asset Pricing Studies* (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raae009. Predicting the Equity Premium with Combination Forecasts: A Reappraisal
Sebastian Denk & Günter Löffler · Review of Asset Pricing Studies · 2024
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raae009 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.62 × 0.4 = 0.25 M · momentum 0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.